New Hampshire Fires First Shot Of Civil War by passing Resolution


The following email was forwarded to me… I thought it might be of interest to some viewers of this blog

— On Wed, 6/16/10, Kuerno De Chivo <kuernodec….@….com >
From: Kuerno De Chivo <kuernodec….@….com>
Subject: New Hampshire (not Texas) Fires First Shot Of Civil War?
To:
Date: Wednesday, June 16, 2010, 11:13 PM
This is pretty incredible.  As I did my last news search for the night I found this article (over a week old).
Let’s see if they really put any teeth behind this as the intention is surprisingly clear!

http://69.84.25.250/blogger/post/New-Hampshire-Fires-First-Shot-Of-Civil-War-by-passing-Resolution-Immediately-Voiding-Several-Federal-Laws.aspx

http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2009/HCR0006.html

New Hampshire Fires First Shot Of Civil War by passing  Resolution Immediately Voiding Several Federal Laws,

Threatens Counterstrike Against Federal “Breach Of Peace”

6/6/2010 Posted By Pat Dollard.

The New Hampshire state legislature took an unbelievably bold step Monday by introducing a resolution to declare certain actions by the federal government to completely totally void and warning that certain future acts will be viewed as a “breach of peace” with the states themselves that risks nullifying the Constitution.”

This act by New Hampshire is a clear warning to the federal government that they could face being stripped of their power by the States (presumably through civil war!).

The remarkable document outlines with perfect clarity, some basics long forgotten. For instance, it reminds Congress “That the Constitution of the United States, having delegated to Congress a power to punish treason, counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States, piracies, and felonies committed on the high seas, and offences against the law of nations, slavery, and no other crimes whatsoever;. . . . . therefore all acts of Congress which assume to create, define, or punish crimes, other than those so enumerated in the Constitution are altogether void, and of no force;”

Federal gun crime laws? Void. Federal drug crime laws? Void. The gazzillion other federal criminal laws that deal with anything other than the specific enumerated crimes? ALL VOID.

One would think that if any lawyer anywhere in the entire country was worth his salt, all federal criminal trials would have ended years ago. This seems to prove that most lawyers are dullards.

New Hampshire deals a complete death blow to the pending federal hate crimes legislation by pointing out “That, therefore, all acts of Congress of the United States which do abridge the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, are not law, but are altogether void, and of no force;

. . . . .”
Later in the Resolution, New Hampshire makes clear what the feds are now risking if they proceed further: The removal of all powers from the federal government by the States!

Quoting directly from the Resolution: [“That any Act by the Congress of the United States, Executive Order of the President of the United States of America or Judicial Order by the Judicatories of the United States of America which assumes a power not delegated to the government of United States of America by the Constitution for the United States of America and which serves to diminish the liberty of the any of the several States or their citizens shall constitute a nullification of the Constitution for the United States of America by the government of the United States of America. Acts which would cause such a nullification include, but are not limited to:

I. Establishing martial law or a state of emergency within one of the States comprising the United States of America without the consent of the legislature of that State.

II. Requiring involuntary servitude, or governmental service other than a draft during a declared war, or pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law.

III. Requiring involuntary servitude or governmental service of persons under the age of 18 other than pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law.

IV. Surrendering any power delegated or not delegated to any corporation or foreign government.

V. Any act regarding religion; further limitations on freedom of political speech; or further limitations on freedom of the press.

VI. Further infringements on the right to keep and bear arms including prohibitions of type or quantity of arms or ammunition; and That should any such act of Congress become law or Executive Order or Judicial Order be put into force, all powers previously delegated to the United States of America by the Constitution for the United States shall revert to the several States individually. Any future government of the United States of America shall require ratification of three quarters of the States seeking to form a government of the United States of America and shall not be binding upon any State not seeking to form such a government; and That copies of this resolution be transmitted by the house clerk to the President of the United States, each member of the United States Congress, and the presiding officers of each State’s legislature.”]

Advertisements

4 Comments

  1. I do not believe the prophesy in the 87th section of the D&C was fulfilled in the US civil war. For one thing the Lord says “wars” not war. I have full confidence that God knows the difference between the plural and the singular form of war. Also speaking of South Carolina the Lord says: And the time will come that war will be poured out upon all nations, beginning at this place.
    I just don’t see the Lord fulfilling His prophesies in the metaphorical disjointed manner we must accept if this scripture refers only to South Carolina’s secession in Dec 1860. I think section 87 is talking about it happening again and another war will begin there. I could be wrong. But it is important to me as it seems to be directly connected to the fulfillment of the Lord’s words in 3 Nephi about the remnant going through and tearing in pieces the gentiles.
    By the way I estimate there are tens of thousands of elected official which should have done what New Hampshire just did. I dearly hope it makes a difference. If nothing else like this blog to awake people to new truths and motivate them to action. It will not save the USA. The consumption decreed will make a full end of all nations. But learning the truth and living it does save our souls.

  2. I read this article too and got all excited about it. But, it turns out this is old news (not sure why its making new rounds on the internet now). This bill was from 2009 and never made it passed committee. Too bad. Can you imagine if even a handful of states were able to pass such a bill?

  3. I can no longer acces your three watches blog…. any help?

  4. In regards to access to OWIW’s blog:

    See here


Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s