<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for LDS Anarchy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ldsanarchy.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ldsanarchy.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Not your average Mormon blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:49:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The many definitions of adultery by Alld</title>
		<link>http://ldsanarchy.wordpress.com/2008/08/06/the-many-definitions-of-adultery/#comment-3763</link>
		<dc:creator>Alld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldsanarchy.wordpress.com/?p=349#comment-3763</guid>
		<description>So in these definitions could one come to conclude that kissing, (although being courting) would not be adultery? Would this still be a church punishable offense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So in these definitions could one come to conclude that kissing, (although being courting) would not be adultery? Would this still be a church punishable offense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Keep your eye on the planets! by LDS Anarchist</title>
		<link>http://ldsanarchy.wordpress.com/2009/06/13/keep-your-eye-on-the-planets/#comment-3762</link>
		<dc:creator>LDS Anarchist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldsanarchy.wordpress.com/?p=1612#comment-3762</guid>
		<description>Yeah, yeah, I know this is now old news, but I wasn&#039;t able to post this here when the story first broke, so as there may still be some people who aren&#039;t aware of it, and as it deals, yet again, with the topic of Saturn, here we go again...

&lt;a href=&quot;New Saturn Ring Is Largest Known; May Solve Moon Puzzle&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;New Saturn Ring Is Largest Known; May Solve Moon Puzzle&lt;/a&gt;

Make sure you click the picture to enlarge it to get a better idea of how gigantic the ring is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, yeah, I know this is now old news, but I wasn&#8217;t able to post this here when the story first broke, so as there may still be some people who aren&#8217;t aware of it, and as it deals, yet again, with the topic of Saturn, here we go again&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="New Saturn Ring Is Largest Known; May Solve Moon Puzzle" rel="nofollow">New Saturn Ring Is Largest Known; May Solve Moon Puzzle</a></p>
<p>Make sure you click the picture to enlarge it to get a better idea of how gigantic the ring is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The interpolation of a footnote by LDS Anarchist</title>
		<link>http://ldsanarchy.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/the-interpolation-of-a-footnote/#comment-3761</link>
		<dc:creator>LDS Anarchist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldsanarchy.wordpress.com/2007/10/16/the-interpolation-of-a-footnote/#comment-3761</guid>
		<description>Justin found an interesting tidbit from the TG that applies to this discussion.  Read his comment &lt;a href=&quot;http://ldsanarchy.wordpress.com/2007/12/30/how-the-scriptural-helps-brainwash-you/#comment-3759&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin found an interesting tidbit from the TG that applies to this discussion.  Read his comment <a href="http://ldsanarchy.wordpress.com/2007/12/30/how-the-scriptural-helps-brainwash-you/#comment-3759" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How the scriptural &#8220;helps&#8221; brainwash you by LDS Anarchist</title>
		<link>http://ldsanarchy.wordpress.com/2007/12/30/how-the-scriptural-helps-brainwash-you/#comment-3760</link>
		<dc:creator>LDS Anarchist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldsanarchy.wordpress.com/2007/12/30/how-the-scriptural-helps-brainwash-you/#comment-3760</guid>
		<description>Ha!  I missed that!  Good work, detective!  Here is &lt;a href=&quot;http://scriptures.lds.org/en/tg/m/67&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the link&lt;/a&gt; in case anyone wants to see the TG entry for himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha!  I missed that!  Good work, detective!  Here is <a href="http://scriptures.lds.org/en/tg/m/67" rel="nofollow">the link</a> in case anyone wants to see the TG entry for himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How the scriptural &#8220;helps&#8221; brainwash you by Justin</title>
		<link>http://ldsanarchy.wordpress.com/2007/12/30/how-the-scriptural-helps-brainwash-you/#comment-3759</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldsanarchy.wordpress.com/2007/12/30/how-the-scriptural-helps-brainwash-you/#comment-3759</guid>
		<description>I read this post for the first time last week, and while looking for a scripture in the Topical Guide, I found further reinforcement of the erronious footnote in D&amp;C 49:18.

The TG entry for &quot;meat&quot; reads:
&quot;1 Tim. 4: 3 (D&amp;C 49: 18) commanding to abstain from m.&quot;

Yet, as another post of yours correctly demonstrates, D&amp;C 49:18 does not say anything about &quot;commanding to abstain&quot; -- rather, it is about forbidding someone from abstaining.  Which the Church does when it interprets the verse via that footnote and this entry in the TG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read this post for the first time last week, and while looking for a scripture in the Topical Guide, I found further reinforcement of the erronious footnote in D&amp;C 49:18.</p>
<p>The TG entry for &#8220;meat&#8221; reads:<br />
&#8220;1 Tim. 4: 3 (D&amp;C 49: 18) commanding to abstain from m.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yet, as another post of yours correctly demonstrates, D&amp;C 49:18 does not say anything about &#8220;commanding to abstain&#8221; &#8212; rather, it is about forbidding someone from abstaining.  Which the Church does when it interprets the verse via that footnote and this entry in the TG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Extended fasting: a cure for all spiritual AND PHYSICAL ailments by Michael Decker</title>
		<link>http://ldsanarchy.wordpress.com/2008/03/30/extended-fasting-a-cure-for-all-spiritual-and-physical-ailments/#comment-3757</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Decker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldsanarchy.wordpress.com/2008/03/30/extended-fasting-a-cure-for-all-spiritual-and-physical-ailments/#comment-3757</guid>
		<description>I think I am going to do something similar.  You inspired me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I am going to do something similar.  You inspired me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A small break by LDS Anarchist</title>
		<link>http://ldsanarchy.wordpress.com/2007/11/09/a-small-break/#comment-3756</link>
		<dc:creator>LDS Anarchist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldsanarchy.wordpress.com/2007/11/09/a-small-break/#comment-3756</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the compliment and suggestions, Sam.  I doubt I&#039;ll be writing about 1, 2 and 4.  I&#039;ve never seen the Liahona, nor a Urim and Thummim (and so don&#039;t know much about them) and I think there is &lt;a href=&quot;http://platesofmormon.wordpress.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a blog dedicated to Book of Mormon geography&lt;/a&gt; already.  But your third suggestion sounds like a topic I could try addressing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the compliment and suggestions, Sam.  I doubt I&#8217;ll be writing about 1, 2 and 4.  I&#8217;ve never seen the Liahona, nor a Urim and Thummim (and so don&#8217;t know much about them) and I think there is <a href="http://platesofmormon.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">a blog dedicated to Book of Mormon geography</a> already.  But your third suggestion sounds like a topic I could try addressing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Breaking News: Joseph Smith&#8217;s Daguerrotype is scanned and uploaded by LDS Anarchist</title>
		<link>http://ldsanarchy.wordpress.com/2008/03/26/breaking-news-joseph-smiths-daguerrotype-is-scanned-and-uploaded/#comment-3755</link>
		<dc:creator>LDS Anarchist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldsanarchy.wordpress.com/?p=126#comment-3755</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know who you are, Phantom Saint, but I read your linked page and I&#039;ve decided to let your comment stay put, even though it has nothing to do with this post, if for no other reason than to have a link to your site and see what else you come up with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know who you are, Phantom Saint, but I read your linked page and I&#8217;ve decided to let your comment stay put, even though it has nothing to do with this post, if for no other reason than to have a link to your site and see what else you come up with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Breaking News: Joseph Smith&#8217;s Daguerrotype is scanned and uploaded by lrwhitney</title>
		<link>http://ldsanarchy.wordpress.com/2008/03/26/breaking-news-joseph-smiths-daguerrotype-is-scanned-and-uploaded/#comment-3754</link>
		<dc:creator>lrwhitney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 08:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldsanarchy.wordpress.com/?p=126#comment-3754</guid>
		<description>http://wp.me/pF3iD-l</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://wp.me/pF3iD-l" rel="nofollow">http://wp.me/pF3iD-l</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What the Word of Wisdom says and what it doesn&#8217;t say by Brutus Epiglottis</title>
		<link>http://ldsanarchy.wordpress.com/2008/05/02/what-the-word-of-wisdom-says-and-what-it-doesnt-say/#comment-3753</link>
		<dc:creator>Brutus Epiglottis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldsanarchy.wordpress.com/?p=144#comment-3753</guid>
		<description>Read it backwards? - from the end to the beginning? Is that anything like playing Jimi Hendrix backwards or something? Are there secret combinations hidden?

D&amp;C 89 v21
12v 98 C&amp;D

12 volts 98 something C and D?

Hmmmm.  98 is the Win98 OS.  C and D are drive designations.

Somebody crack this code.

OMG - how did Joseph Smith know about Windows 98 and 12 volt batteries back in the day? No way Hosea.  Proof right there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read it backwards? &#8211; from the end to the beginning? Is that anything like playing Jimi Hendrix backwards or something? Are there secret combinations hidden?</p>
<p>D&amp;C 89 v21<br />
12v 98 C&amp;D</p>
<p>12 volts 98 something C and D?</p>
<p>Hmmmm.  98 is the Win98 OS.  C and D are drive designations.</p>
<p>Somebody crack this code.</p>
<p>OMG &#8211; how did Joseph Smith know about Windows 98 and 12 volt batteries back in the day? No way Hosea.  Proof right there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
